Imagine a courtroom with machines and robots, replacing our traditional lawyers in black gowns. Quite an interesting thought, isn’t it? Our agenda for today is to tackle a very complex question and hopefully come up with an answer-Should AI replace our judges and the conventional courtroom system? Ethics, justice and advancement in technology are all called to the stand here. So grab your gavels to proclaim your judgement while I present you with the facts
Consistent And Objective Approach
Unlike us mere mortals, algorithms do not get tired or let emotions cloud their judgement. A prerequisite to excel in the field of justice is the ability to put aside your emotions and play by the rule book while making decisions. Algorithms would be unbiased and will be able to provide fairer outcomes without letting human prejudices get in the way of administering justice. An unswayed and fair justice system? Now that’s a good deal. The ability to comprehend information swiftly adds brownie points to all those in favour of AI taking over. This aids us to let go of our traditional working of the judiciary, where one will have to spend his entire lifetime waiting for a verdict which adds to emotional and financial strain on the individual.
Fact-Based Analysis
Algorithms prove to be more effective in analysing previous precedents, going through law books effectively and coming up with a verdict that abides by the book after a comprehensive analysis. This could help in more accurate and data-driven judgments rather than ones which have been manipulated by the play of human emotions or any other driving force. Who knew that something that was once considered to be our biggest weapon would also be our biggest weakness when it comes to the field of administering justice?
Lack Of Accountability And Emotions
Legal proceedings often require empathy, compassion and an ability to analyse the emotional state of all parties involved-qualities that AI struggles to provide us with. Humans are able to analyse the complex play of emotions in each case and provide a judgement, taking into account the nuances presented before it.
Hybrid Form Of Judiciary
Now, as an aspiring lawyer, I have my own biases in this scenario. If AI takes over, it might leave me stranded and unemployed, so that is definitely not my favourite option. I think a rational and more practical approach would be to adopt a hybrid form of law rather than to completely replace humans with technology. While algorithms can be used for analysing the data and recommending verdicts , let’s leave the decision-making powers with their makers.
In this manner, we will be able to enjoy the best of both worlds.
Maintaining an equilibrium between humans and technology seems to be the best way forward for the smooth functioning of our judiciary. The crossroad between humans and technology is a topic of debate, not just in the field of law, but all across the globe.
Conversations about the replacement of humans in various fields is a well discussed topic, with some people in favour of giving the reins to algorithms, while others are concerned about technology taking over.
Do you think we should let algorithms take over our justice system or is justice best served with a touch of human emotions and wisdom? Let us know what you think in the comments
Comments